Essay Topics
Types of Essays
Essay Checklist
Word Counter
Readability Score
Essay Rewriter
Mankind has struggled with the question of what happens after death for ages. Two arguments, a posteriori and a priori, propose different views on this subject. A Priori arguments are based on general claims independent of what exists in the world. These always depend upon some innate awareness or idea in humans. A Posteriori arguments are based on the existence of the world of things or facts about the world. They always depend upon the ability humans have to observe and reason. Near death/after death experiences supports a posteriori argument. This essay will look at an a posteriori argument dealing with near death/after death experiences. Near death/after death experiences come from people who have been clinically dead, not biologically dead. With clinical death, life signs such as consciousness, pulse, and breathing have stopped. Biological death will occur if no measures are taken to reverse this process. Biological death is irreversible. The near death experience can occur at different stages of clinical death. Many of these experiences occur in the hospital under close medical attention such as a cardiac arrest, surgery, or a trauma situation. Many of these people report having similar experiences, including leaving the body and watching from above as medical staff work on them, entering a dark tunnel, seeing others, meeting a spiritual being, and experiencing an overwhelming sense of peace and love. They describe their strong desire to stay in this peaceful and loving place, but are told or have a strong desire to return to their physical bodies. Intriguing is the fact that these people have very similar experiences. I believe that near death/after death experiences are the strongest in support of an afterlife. We cannot doubt that people have these experiences, because to them, they are real. The problem is how to understand or explain them. Arguments have been made that these are products of hallucination induced by drugs/medication or chemical reactions in the body to their medical crisis. They may be recalling previous encounters long forgotten and hidden in their deep unconscious. But near death/after death experiences occur without the influence of drugs or medications such as near drowning or electrical shock. These victims are able to clearly describe places and people with exact detail while they were clinically dead. They are able to describe in detail objects in rooms nearby and far away from them. They have observed the people working on them and can recall what was said and who said it. Their experiences parallel those of victims in controlled situations such as hospitals. This a posteriori argument depends on the truth-claims made by others on their near death/after death experiences. The problem is not if these claims are true, but how to understand and interpret them. For me, near death/after death experiences may not prove there is a heaven or hell, but they do show that at death the soul separates from the body, and that a persons spirit is conscious and coherent at death. But near death/after death truth claims do not tell what lies beyond the grave, just gives a little glimpse.
Essay Writing Checklist
The following guidelines are designed to give students a checklist to use, whether they are revising individually or as part of a peer review team.
Introduction
  • Is the main idea (i.e., the writer's opinion of the story title) stated clearly?
  • Is the introductory paragraph interesting? Does it make the reader want to keep on reading?
Body Paragraph
  • Does each body paragraph have a clear topic sentence that is related to the main idea of the essay?
  • Does each body paragraph include specific information from the text(including quoted evidence from the text, if required by the instructor)that supports the topic sentence?
  • Is there a clear plan for the order of the body paragraphs (i.e., order of importance, chronology in the story, etc.)?
  • Does each body paragraph transition smoothly to the next?
Conclusion
  • Is the main idea of the essay restated in different words?
  • Are the supporting ideas summarized succinctly and clearly?
  • Is the concluding paragraph interesting? Does it leave an impression on the reader?
Overall Essay
  • Is any important material left unsaid?
  • Is any material repetitious and unnecessary?
  • Has the writer tried to incorporate "voice" in the essay so that it has his/her distinctive mark?
  • Are there changes needed in word choice, sentence length and structure, etc.?
  • Are the quotations (if required) properly cited?
  • Has the essay been proofread for spelling, punctuation, grammar, etc.?
  • Does the essay have an interesting and appropriate title?
Argument essay of What Happens After Death
Trending Essay Topics
Explore today's trending essay topics:
Reference
Feel free to use content on this page for your website, blog or paper we only ask that you reference content back to us. Use the following code to link this page:
Terms · Privacy · Contact
Essay Topics © 2019

Argument Essay Of What Happens After Death

Words: 522    Pages: 2    Paragraphs: 6    Sentences: 32    Read Time: 01:53
Highlight Text to add correction. Use an editor to spell check essay.
              Mankind has struggled with the question of what happens after death for ages. Two arguments, a posteriori and a priori, propose different views on this subject. A Priori arguments are based on general claims independent of what exists in the world. These always depend upon some innate awareness or idea in humans. A Posteriori arguments are based on the existence of the world of things or facts about the world. They always depend upon the ability humans have to observe and reason. Near death/after death experiences supports a posteriori argument. This essay will look at an a posteriori argument dealing with near death/after death experiences.
             
             
              Near death/after death experiences come from people who have been clinically dead, not biologically dead. With clinical death, life signs such as consciousness, pulse, and breathing have stopped. Biological death will occur if no measures are taken to reverse this process. Biological death is irreversible.
             
              The near death experience can occur at different stages of clinical death. Many of these experiences occur in the hospital under close medical attention such as a cardiac arrest, surgery, or a trauma situation. Many of these people report having similar experiences, including leaving the body and watching from above as medical staff work on them, entering a dark tunnel, seeing others, meeting a spiritual being, and experiencing an overwhelming sense of peace and love. They describe their strong desire to stay in this peaceful and loving place, but are told or have a strong desire to return to their physical bodies. Intriguing is the fact that these people have very similar experiences.
             
              I believe that near death/after death experiences are the strongest in support of an afterlife. We cannot doubt that people have these experiences, because to them, they are real. The problem is how to understand or explain them. Arguments have been made that these are products of hallucination induced by drugs/medication or chemical reactions in the body to their medical crisis. They may be recalling previous encounters long forgotten and hidden in their deep unconscious.
             
              But near death/after death experiences occur without the influence of drugs or medications such as near drowning or electrical shock. These victims are able to clearly describe places and people with exact detail while they were clinically dead. They are able to describe in detail objects in rooms nearby and far away from them. They have observed the people working on them and can recall what was said and who said it. Their experiences parallel those of victims in controlled situations such as hospitals.
             
              This a posteriori argument depends on the truth-claims made by others on their near death/after death experiences. The problem is not if these claims are true, but how to understand and interpret them. For me, near death/after death experiences may not prove there is a heaven or hell, but they do show that at death the soul separates from the body, and that a persons spirit is conscious and coherent at death. But near death/after death truth claims do not tell what lies beyond the grave, just gives a little glimpse.
Death Essay 
+1
Tip: Use our Essay Rewriter to rewrite this essay and remove plagiarism.

Add Notes

Have suggestions, comments or ideas? Please share below. Don't forget to tag a friend or classmate.
clear
Formatting Help
Submit
Sitemapsaison 10, épisode 8 - Deux contre un | Lenovo Launcher APK | Cardinal - Season 3